Compare / Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 69.9 vs 60.3. On the 6 benchmarks both labs report, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B wins 6 and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct wins 0. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is smaller: it needs about 22.6 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 25.3 GB for Seed-OSS 36B Instruct. Only Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.24 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Qwen3.5 35B-A3B if…
- you want the strongest model overall
- you mostly write code
- you need math and reasoning
- you have limited memory (about 22.6 GB at 4-bit)
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you need image input
- you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)
Pick Seed-OSS 36B Instruct if…
- you work with long documents
Specifications
| Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 69.9 (likely 69–71) | 60.3 (likely 57–64) |
| Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) · China | ByteDance Seed · China |
| Released | 2026-02-24 | 2025-08-20 |
| Parameters | 35B (3B active, MoE) | 36.2B (dense) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~22.6 GB | ~25.3 GB |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 512K tokens |
| Input | text, image, video | text |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | Always thinks |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API price / 1M tokens | $0.24 ($0.065 in, $0.75 out) | Self-host only |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 1.7M | 40.7K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Seed-OSS 36B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Knowledge | 85.3 | 82.7 |
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 84.2 | 71.4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning | 22.4 | 10.1 |
| AIME Math | 91.0 | 84.7 |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | 74.6 | 67.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified Coding | 70.0 | 56.0 |
| Terminal-Bench Agentic | 40.5 | — |
| MMMU-Pro Vision | 75.1 | — |
| MMLU Knowledge | — | 87.4 |
| Multilingual MMLU Multilingual | — | 78.4 |
| IFEval Instruction following | — | 85.8 |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Seed-OSS 36B Instruct?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 69.9 vs 60.3. On the 6 benchmarks both labs report, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B wins 6 and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct wins 0.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.24 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is smaller: it needs about 22.6 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 25.3 GB for Seed-OSS 36B Instruct.
Which has the longer context window?
Seed-OSS 36B Instruct has the longer context window: 512K tokens against 262K.
Can I use Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Seed-OSS 36B Instruct commercially?
Both are released under the Apache-2.0 license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
- Edge0 35B-A3B (preview) vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
- Hermes 4.3 36B vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
- Edge0 35B-A3B (preview) vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
- Hermes 4.3 36B vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Seed-OSS 36B Instruct