Compare / Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs LLaDA2.2 mini

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs LLaDA2.2 mini

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker scores higher on the Small LM Index: 60.9 vs 29.7. On the 4 benchmarks both labs report, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker wins 4 and LLaDA2.2 mini wins 0. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself.

Pick Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you need math and reasoning
  • you build agents that call tools
  • you work with long documents
  • you need image input

Pick LLaDA2.2 mini if…

No clear advantage in the data we have.

Specifications

Apriel 1.6 15B ThinkerLLaDA2.2 mini
Small LM Index60.9 (likely 59–63)29.7 (likely 26–34)
LabServiceNow (Apriel) · United StatesInclusionAI (Ling) · China
Released2025-12-042026-09-05
Parameters14.9B (dense)16.3B (1.4B active, MoE)
Memory at 4-bit~11.4 GB~11 GB
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
Inputtext, imagetext
ReasoningAlways thinksNo thinking
LicenseMITApache-2.0
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host onlySelf-host only
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)1.2K4K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkApriel 1.6 15B ThinkerLLaDA2.2 mini
MMLU-Pro Knowledge79.0≈ 57
GPQA Diamond Knowledge73.044.4
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning10.0≈ 2
AIME Math88.035.1
LiveCodeBench Coding≈ 7028.1
Terminal-Bench Agentic14.0—
τ²-Bench Agentic64.657.5
IFBench Instruction following—24.9
MMMU-Pro Vision60.3—
BFCL Agentic63.547.7
AA-LCR Long context50.0—

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker or LLaDA2.2 mini?

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker scores higher on the Small LM Index: 60.9 vs 29.7. On the 4 benchmarks both labs report, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker wins 4 and LLaDA2.2 mini wins 0.

Which is cheaper to run?

Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker has the longer context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Can I use Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker and LLaDA2.2 mini commercially?

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker is released under MIT and LLaDA2.2 mini under Apache-2.0. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons

Guides featuring these models