Compare / Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs Phi-4

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs Phi-4

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker scores higher on the Small LM Index: 60.9 vs 44.7. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.

Pick Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you work with long documents
  • you need image input

Pick Phi-4 if…

  • you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Specifications

Apriel 1.6 15B ThinkerPhi-4
Small LM Index60.9 (likely 59–63)44.7 (likely 35–55)
LabServiceNow (Apriel) · United StatesMicrosoft (Phi) · United States
Released2025-12-042024-12-12
Parameters14.9B (dense)14.7B (dense)
Memory at 4-bit~11.4 GB~11.4 GB
Context window262K tokens16K tokens
Inputtext, imagetext
ReasoningAlways thinksNo thinking
LicenseMITMIT
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host only$0.070 ($0.056 in, $0.11 out)
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)1.2K327K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkApriel 1.6 15B ThinkerPhi-4
MMLU-Pro Knowledge79.070.4
GPQA Diamond Knowledge73.056.1
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning10.0≈ 5
AIME Math88.0≈ 61
Terminal-Bench Agentic14.0—
τ²-Bench Agentic64.6—
MMMU-Pro Vision60.3—
BFCL Agentic63.5—
AA-LCR Long context50.0—

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker or Phi-4?

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker scores higher on the Small LM Index: 60.9 vs 44.7. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0.

Which is cheaper to run?

Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker has the longer context window: 262K tokens against 16K.

Can I use Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker and Phi-4 commercially?

Both are released under the MIT license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons

Guides featuring these models